Authors: Dalbo VJ, Roberts MD, Hassell SE, Moon JR, Kerksick CM
Citation: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2010 Oct;20(5):381-92
PMID : 20975106, Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab, 20, 5
Date created: 2010-10-26
BACKGROUND: This investigation examined the safety and efficacy of a silica-based mineral antioxidant complex (MAC) that has been suggested to influence body water and buffer lactate.
METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized crossover design, male participants completed testing for 3 conditions: water only (baseline), rice flour (placebo), and MAC supplementation. Participants visited the laboratory on 5 occasions: familiarization, baseline, Testing Day 1, washout, and Testing Day 2. Baseline and Testing Days 1 and 2 consisted of fasting blood, pre- to postexercise body-water assessment and determination of VO2peak on a cycle ergometer. The supplementation protocols were separated by 1 wk and balanced to minimize an order effect.
RESULTS: No differences between conditions were found for heart rate, blood pressure, or serum-safety markers (p>.05). Before exercise there were no differences between conditions for total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), or extracellular water (ECW). No significant interactive effects for supplementation and exercise were found for TBW, ICW, or ECW (p>.05). A time effect for TBW (p<.01) and ICW (p<.001) was present. Within-group changes in TBW occurred in the MAC condition, and within-group changes for ICW occurred in the MAC and placebo conditions. Ratings of perceived exertion and blood lactate increased (p<.05) with exercise. No significant effects were found for performance variables.
CONCLUSIONS: MAC supplementation had no impact on aerobic exercise performance and lactate response. Increases in TBW and ICW occurred after MAC consumption, but these changes appeared to have minimal physiological impact.